A cryptocurrency project, World Liberty Financial (WLFI), which has ties to President Donald Trump, is at the center of a major controversy over its token freezing practices. Several prominent figures in the crypto community have publicly stated that their WLFI tokens were frozen, leading to questions about the project's compliance procedures.
The Core Dispute: Token Freezing and Compliance
The controversy revolves around WLFI's compliance team freezing the tokens of certain investors. Bruno Skvorc, the Polygon Developer Relations lead, took to X (formerly Twitter) to voice his frustration, stating that WLFI flagged his wallet address as “high risk” due to “blockchain exposure” and refused to unfreeze his tokens. Skvorc harshly criticized WLFI's actions, calling it a “new-era mafia,” and claimed he was one of six investors who had 100% of their tokens locked from the start.
Similarly, Tron founder Justin Sun revealed that his WLFI token allocation was also frozen. Sun's wallet was reportedly blacklisted by WLFI after being flagged by a blockchain tracker for a single $9 million transaction. This incident highlights the potential flaws of automated compliance tools. As pointed out by on-chain detective ZachXBT, these tools often flag addresses as “high risk” for trivial or incorrect reasons.
Recent WLFI Activities
Beyond the token freezing dispute, WLFI has had several other notable activities:
-
Technical Updates and Roadmap: The WLFI team is reportedly moving forward with its technical development and project roadmap, aiming to create an ecosystem that blends traditional financial services with cryptocurrency technology. However, specific progress and details have not been fully disclosed.
-
Partnerships and Ecosystem Building: WLFI has previously announced plans to form partnerships with various institutions to expand its ecosystem. However, the current token freezing scandal could negatively impact these future collaborations.
This event not only exposes issues with WLFI's token distribution and compliance handling but also prompts the industry to reflect on the fairness and accuracy of automated compliance tools. For investors, such incidents serve as a crucial reminder to conduct thorough due diligence and be aware of potential risks when investing in new projects.
